Pharmaceutical Subject Matter Expert – AI Model Evaluation

Volga Partners

. Evaluate AI-generated pharmaceutical content for scientific, technical, and regulatory accuracy, completeness, consistency, and compliance .

Posted 10/27/2026contractRemote • United States, Australia, United Kingdom, CanadaMid-LevelSenior💰 $20 - $50 per hourWebsite

Core Competencies

Role fit

Core Competencies

Use this summary to align your resume positioning with the role.

Demonstrates expertise in evaluating AI-generated pharmaceutical content for scientific and regulatory accuracy, with a strong foundation in FDA requirements, GMP regulations, and ICH guidelines. Capable of providing detailed feedback and recommendations while adhering to quality standards in a freelance engagement model.

Highest-signal resume keywords

Pharmaceutical Industry ExpertiseFDA Requirements KnowledgeGMP Regulations FamiliarityAnalytical and Problem-Solving SkillsTechnical Writing Experience

ATS Keywords

Tailor your resume

Applicant Tracking System Keywords

Tip: use these terms in your resume and cover letter to boost ATS matches.

Hard Skills

Scientific EvaluationRegulatory Compliance AssessmentQuality ReviewData AnnotationProject-Specific Evaluation CriteriaResearch SkillsTechnical AnalysisContent ReviewRegulatory Submission PreparationAI Model Evaluation

Soft Skills

Excellent Written CommunicationIndependent Work AbilityAttention to DetailConfidence in Reviewing Complex InformationCritical Thinking

Tools & Technologies

Digital PlatformsWeb-Based ApplicationsOnline Research Tools

Certifications & Qualifications

PharmDPhDAdvanced Scientific Credentials

Industry Keywords

Pharmaceutical SciencesBiotechnologyQuality SystemsValidationManufacturingICH GuidelinesRegulatory AffairsINDNDABLA

About the role

Key responsibilities & impact

Evaluate AI-generated pharmaceutical content for scientific, technical, and regulatory accuracy, completeness, consistency, and compliance
Review information related to quality systems, manufacturing, validation, submissions, development, and compliance
Analyze whether AI-generated conclusions are supported by scientific principles, regulatory expectations, and industry best practices
Identify unsupported claims, technical inaccuracies, missing context, and flawed reasoning
Reference FDA requirements, GMP regulations, ICH guidelines, and accepted pharmaceutical industry practices
Provide expert feedback, explain findings, identify improvements, and recommend accurate corrections
Apply project-specific evaluation criteria, scoring guidelines, and quality standards
Complete independent evaluations using designated online platforms within project timelines

Requirements

What you’ll need

Minimum of four years of relevant professional experience in the regulated US based pharmaceutical or biotechnology industry
Bachelor's degree or higher in Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chemistry, Biotechnology, Engineering, Regulatory Affairs, or a related discipline
Strong expertise in at least one listed pharmaceutical specialty
Working knowledge of FDA requirements, GMP regulations, and relevant ICH guidelines, including applicable portions of ICH Q7-Q12
Ability to critically evaluate scientific, technical, and regulatory information
Strong analytical, research, and problem-solving abilities
Excellent written English communication skills
Confidence reviewing complex information and explaining technical conclusions
Comfort using digital platforms, web-based applications, and online research tools
Ability to work independently, follow detailed instructions, and meet established quality standards
Must understand and be comfortable with a task-based freelance engagement model
Preferred: PharmD, PhD, or advanced scientific credentials
Preferred: Experience preparing or reviewing regulatory submissions (IND, NDA, BLA, ANDA, MAA, or equivalent)
Preferred: Experience with FDA-regulated manufacturing, quality, compliance, validation, or development environments
Preferred: Experience performing quality reviews, regulatory audits, or scientific content evaluations
Preferred: Experience with technical writing, structured reviews, or compliance assessments
Preferred: Familiarity with AI model evaluation, prompt review, rubric development, or data annotation
Preferred: Previous involvement in scientific, regulatory, quality, or technical content assessment activities

Benefits

Comp & perks

Remote work from an eligible location
Flexible, variable, assignment-based schedule
Project-based assignments with supplemental-income flexibility
Opportunity to contribute to advanced AI technologies
Experience contributing to AI evaluation initiatives
No AI background required